John Hodgman, everybody, lecturing the Radio
and TV Correspondents’ Dinner on nerds and jocks.
I like how CSPAN has nearly completed its
transformation into a comedy showcase of
my favorite people. (via Daniel Jalkut)
Glee
opens on a scene of cheerleaders with abrasive coach Sue Sylvester;
it’s Jane
Lynch playing the same role she played in Role Models. Cut to
title scene “Glee”.
Do the cheerleaders or Jane Lynch play an
important role in the narrative of Glee? No. In an
impressive directing decision, the cold open
completely fails to illuminate neither the show’s story
or characters.
Cut to scene of our protagonist Will Schuester (Matthew Morrison)
pulling into the parking lot, where jocks throw a nerd into the
dumpster.
“OK,” says you. “One of the show’s central themes
is that high school is hard.” Accurate guess, were
it not terribly wrong. Yet more impressively,
Strangers with Candy does a better job of
conveying that than Glee ever does. A better
theme for the show would be the word mish-mash.
“High school is tough” is mish-mashed with
“Teacher Will Schuester struggles with making
performing cool” is mish-mashed with “Rocky
marriage turns into family and romantic drama” is
mish-mashed with “Bully struggles with peer
pressure” is mish-mashed with “Unpopular kids
finding their place in the world” is mish-mashed
with “Woman finds unrequited love in married man”.
Glee spends all of 12 minutes (act one) packing
these plots and subplots in before cutting
sporadically in and out in the longer act two.
(In the interest of fairness and disclosure of my own laziness, I
stopped watching after the second act.)
“OK, the plot has problems, mainly that I’ve seen
both Strangers with Candy and Hamlet 2 and
High School Musicals 1 Through 9. What about the
characters?” You can’t see me, but I’m
patronizingly ruffling your hair right now. Will
Schuester is a teacher going against both his
administration and the de facto social structure.
Someone we can root for, until he frames athelete
Finn Hudson (Cory Monteith) for
marijuana possession. “A complicated character,”
you say. Great until you take two steps back and
realize that he did it to force Hudson into
joining glee club at which point the
Disproportionate Action-Motivation Train rolls
into town and everybody gets on board for a
magical journey far far away from Suspended Belief
Land. Schuester is a Good Guy; the story hammers
that enough into the viewer like any good “teacher
against odds” plot (subplot? sub-subplot? main
plot? impossible to tell?). If the writers wanted
Schuester to be a Good Guy with Flaws, they took
the certainly took the most heavy-handed approach
possible.
Yet it’s clear despite the suffocating writing and
haphazard plotting and epileptic directing that
the acting is decent if not wonderful. Jayma Mays
is fantastic as Emma Pillsbury (pictured in the Hulu thumbnail), a character we can
actually sympathize—possibly the only one—with
saddled by the writers with a germaphobic quirk
that’s neither realistic (as in Monk) or funny
(as in Monk). Cue a five-second scene where
Pillsbury cleans a table that neither drives the
story or character forward nor provides laughter.
Principal Figgins (Igbal Theba) deftly strikes the
balance between hard-ass and fatherly as the
slightly cynical principal. And perhaps with more
time and breathing space these characters can
become people with depth and humor and drama and
backstory, with whom we can empathize and I
certainly have no reason to doubt that. But by
throwing them into an overflowing cauldron of a
pilot episode aboard the Disproportionate
Action-Motivation Train chugging at light-speed
away from Suspended Belief Town into Weird,
Mish-Mash Plot Land, Glee does a great
disservice by handicapping the story and the
characters for what appears to be no gain.
Perhaps the greatest roast beef I have with Glee
is that it’s billed as a “musical comedy”. For the
first part, it should be noted that no original
music is being written for the show; that is,
the music itself is not actually comedic. Nor is
it staged particularly comedically. It’s telling
that the funniest music scene is the regional glee
club competition, and even those laughs are pulled
off by contrast not actual music (for reference,
see Little Miss Sunshine). As for the second
part, Glee treats comedy as a filler in between
scenes of drama leading to a particularly flawed
form of comedy-drama—which is a much more
accurate, if more nebulous, genre if we’re going
to be assigning those as the cavemen did—where
comedy and drama are in separate rooms and try to
take peeks at each other through a single small
muddy window; meanwhile, the writers take turns
throwing mud at the window. In pointing out the
places where comedy drives the story or the
character development, I could give you the scene
with Hudson by the dumpster or Berry on the
receiving end of a berry smoothie, but I’d be
hard-pressed to offer anything more substantial.
In a strange way, Glee takes the same approach
to comedy that Family Guy or Punk’d or Sit
Down, Shut Up or a large chunk of Adult Swim’s
programming does: a vehicle for jokes, one-liners,
quirky characters, and pie/smoothie-to-the-face
jokes mostly devoid of basic human compassion for
the characters involved, something that propels
Arrested Development or 30 Rock or even
Everybody Loves Raymond to a level far above
Glee.
But this is just a pilot. Glee is a decent
show at heart that certainly deserves to become
the success everybody else already thinks it is
provided, every now and then, it lets itself
breathe and expand. I’ll be rooting for it.
Everybody Loves Raymond is a gem among sitcoms. It’s not about
bratty adults, usually post-collegiate, with messy relationships
(Scrubs, Friends, Graey’s Anatomy [which might as
well be a huge medicine joke], How I Met Your Mother, House, The
Office). It’s about a family, but not about kids (Fresh Prince,
Two and a Half Men, George Lopez, The Simpsons, and the list
goes on). It’s about adults in a family, which isn’t dysfunctional,
which is as apparent as the difference between its finale shot—in
which the family sits down for dinner—and the Arrested Development
finale, pre-teaser shot—in which Michael and George-Michael sail away
from their soon-to-be convicted family. It’s one of the last sitcoms
that’s not afraid of love. So many shows treat love as a ten-foot high
dragon with a bad breath and a crippling social awkwardness. It’s “he
might love me, he might not” or “should I commit” or “doesn’t
everybody deserve second chances” when you flip past prime-time
sitcoms about relationships. And it’s annoying that writers can’t
approach love with any kind of sentimentality or tenderness or even
realism because it has to be frigging dragon with a frigging
flamethrower on top of a frigging castle. In fact, the show that
anywhere approaches this level of frankness in dealing with love is
Pushing Daisies on ABC, and it’s being canceled after this season.
(Editor’s note: Fuck you, ABC.) ELR is refreshingly, retrospectively
different. Debra loves Ray, despite their flaws; Marie loves Frank,
despite their flaws. The family loves each other. It’s one of the few
TV shows where I’ve watched all the entire series more than four
times. Because it’s radically different comedy, where you can turn on
the TV and not think, “Ha ha, what horrifyingly emotionally disfigured
people these are” but “What a lovely place to be.”
For the purpose of conserving already-endangered Bytes, please slap
yo-self in the butt and absolutely do not bring up any of the
following in a conversation about The Daily Show and The Colbert
Report:
Anything related to Jon Stewart’s appearance on Crossfire;
Anything related to Crossfire’s cancellation;
“Stephen Colbert seems kind of arrogant”;
Colbert is funnier;
Stewart is funnier;
Colbert’s show is too silly for me;
“I can’t believe a comedy show is more trustworthy than the news networks”;
Talk about this mysterious, imaginary “Steven” Colbert; or
Do the same for “John” Stewart.
With your help, we can save the Byte and prevent it from going the way
of the now-extinct bit. Talking about anything else would be extremely
appreciated, repetitious bastards.
The two best Monk episodes are these: (1) “Mr. Monk is Up All Night” for
the beautiful cinematography and surrealism; (2) “Mr. Monk vs. the
Cobra” for the symbolism and the ending.
Now, I know Law and Order has extremely tight writing and, as a
consequence, they fit everything into one hour on the tradeoff that
all their characters have extremely fast reaction times. But sometimes you just get
a magically absurd moment.
Female accountant for a prostitution service (on the verge of tears):
Chanel. It’s Chanel. She’s an exotic British model. She lives with her
boyfriend. (sobs) He’s with organized crime.
Boy, it sure is lucky that her information saved us two days worth of
investigation.
To recreate a murder, the detective avaunts. She leaves the scene, she
scurries, she is no more, et cetera. You would think she’s going to
the crime scene and have an epiphany about the nature of mankind
and/or the murder in question. No. She journeys into some forensics
department room of the police station. It’s completely dark. There’s
an illuminated table in the center with a technician standing opposite
our detective. Sand is falling on the table, or so you think. Until
they begin talking.
Then, you realize with mounting horror and fascination (horcination),
the falling sand and table contraption is actually a hologram machine.
The sand acts as pixels, right? Wrong! When possible hypotheses for
the mechanics of the murder gently float on the table, the sand just
flows around it. Does the sand create the hologram? No. In real life,
that’d be awful. Imagine projecting a movie onto a screen as we do
now. Imagine that screen was infinitely long with tiny holes. Now
accelerate the screen downward at 9.8 meters per second squared for the entire
duration of the movie. Now make that movie three dimensional. That’s
how awful that idea would have been.
Not the type of people to take this setback without fighting, the
writers merely ignored the sand. It’s there to look pretty. It’s
decoration sand. There’s decoration sand in my hologram. The
horcination continues. With every hypothesis, the technician pulls up
a new visualization. How? The viewer has no idea; I have no idea; the
writers probably don’t have any ideas. They’re just standing there,
talking, and new holograms pop up. The detective has a degree in
kinesthesiology, which is the basis for the conversation that’s
ongoing I suppose. Now, you might ask yourself, “Is the conversation
scientifically accurate? Would that redeem the show?” First of all, I
tried to focus on the dialogue and the completely improbable futurism
of the room, and I passed out. The doctors said I had an aneurysm and
hernia and heart attack at the same time induced by stress, but I
think it’s because shutting down the body is its way of defending
against hyper-bullshit.
Nothing can redeem the show. During the last spring season, Jesus
tried and his liver exploded. Jesus doesn’t even have a liver. (They
were invented in 1821, long after he died, came back to life, and
defeated gravity—the final boss.) If you can project your thoughts
onto a 3-D hologram, I refuse to suspend my disbelief. My disbelief is
so great that there’s not enough hard drive space in the world to
which I could suspend it. There’s no limitation to the plot devices
you can construct if you let yourself write an imagination machine
into your TV show. Let there be police robots! Let there be computers
that stop crime before it happens! Wait, this completely abandonment
of reality already happened, and it was called Minority Report, and
I already saw it, damn it.
John Oliver’s Terrifying Times stand-up set premieres on April 20th
on Comedy Central, which is remarkable. It’s the first time a Daily
Show correspondent has done a comedy special while still on the show
as far as I can call, a reversal of what they did with Demetri Martin.
Oliver is also one of the most versatile comedians: In addition to all
this, he along with the wonderful Andy Zaltzmann does the radio with
The Bugle, a consistently funny podcast and truly a pleasure to
hear. I’m working through the archives and “Hotties from History”
along with the reaction from their audience is just comedy gold. I
wish I had caught their Political Animal radio show. Kudos to
whoever casted Oliver onto The Daily Show. He along with John
Hodgman brought the show back after Colbert and Carrell became less
frequent and finally left. They really brought back the tradition
where correspondent sketches could literally go anywhere, Hodgman
with his quiet, insane madness (“John, is that really true? / Yes. I
said it, didn’t I?”) and Oliver with his zany eye for satire (the
3-minute list of silly names for British military figures, “The Meter
is Running”).